Skip to content

Simplify prune-scope mode documentation and fix example#97

Merged
karlrank merged 1 commit intomainfrom
claude/update-integration-docs-PITUl
Feb 10, 2026
Merged

Simplify prune-scope mode documentation and fix example#97
karlrank merged 1 commit intomainfrom
claude/update-integration-docs-PITUl

Conversation

@karlrank
Copy link
Member

Summary

Updated the inbound mapping documentation to clarify the relations prune-scope mode and corrected an example that was using the wrong scope mode.

Key Changes

  • Clarified relations mode description: Updated the documentation to explicitly state that the relations mode finds scope by looking at "all entities related to a specific entity (both direct and reverse relations)" rather than just outbound relations
  • Removed reverse-relations mode: Eliminated the separate reverse-relations mode from the documentation table, as its functionality is now encompassed by the updated relations mode
  • Fixed billing events example: Corrected the example configuration to use "scope_mode": "relations" instead of "scope_mode": "reverse-relations" to align with the updated mode definitions

Implementation Details

This change simplifies the prune-scope mode API by consolidating bidirectional relation lookups into a single relations mode, reducing confusion about which mode to use when dealing with related entities. The documentation and examples now accurately reflect this unified behavior.

https://claude.ai/code/session_019wJ6Y7yqkSciqAJAiEz9cJ

The `reverse-relations` scope_mode has been consolidated into `relations`,
which now handles both direct and reverse relations. Updated the scope_mode
options table and the billing events example accordingly.

https://claude.ai/code/session_019wJ6Y7yqkSciqAJAiEz9cJ
@karlrank karlrank merged commit 09288a5 into main Feb 10, 2026
2 checks passed
@karlrank karlrank deleted the claude/update-integration-docs-PITUl branch February 10, 2026 10:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants